TPBC logo ®

March 16, 2009

Texas Pharmacy Business Council is an organization of American Pharmacies and the Academy of Independent Pharmacists-Texas.
In this issue


Forward this email to a Friend


TDI pharmacy help
The Texas Department of Insurance has a Pharmacist Resource Page that includes links to complaint forms and advises when the next Pharmacy Outreach Conference Call will be held.

Add this link to your online "favorites" list.


Texas legislation  success list
 
Regulation of Rx discount cards


 PBM transparency in state contracts

Mail order parity

becks Texas flag Long may it waveHappy Independence Day!
TPBC draws line in the dirt in PBM battle
Last week was noteworthy in our ongoing fight to teach government and industry how to really save money on prescription drug prices without skinning independent community pharmacy.

I was part of a panel testifying during the U.S. House Subcommittee examining federal employee health benefits. Specifically, I spoke in favor of HR 4489, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) Prescription Drug Integrity, Transparency, and Cost Savings Act by U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass).

The bill is intended to lower costs of prescription drugs in the FEHBP and provide the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with more oversight authority over the prescription drug benefit. Specifically, the act would:
  • prohibit certain ownership relationships (such as CVS/Caremark; 
  • require Pharmacy Benefit Mangers (PBMs) to return 99 percent of all monies received from manufacturers for FEHBP business;
  • require total transparency and disclosure of all contract terms and related information to OPM.
In my testimony, I shared with the committee how transparency in state PBM contracts is projected by the Texas Employees Retirement System to save $260 million during the next four years. This is the result of requiring 100 percent pass through of savings from pharmaceutical manufacturers to the insurer, and hence to the approximately 500,000 current and retired state employees and their families. Subcommittee Chairman Lynch was naturally impressed with this savings! FEHBP has 270 different health plans, so the savings could be astronomical.

I explained that Texas conducted two studies examining the value of transparency in PBM contracts, leading to the legislation that is potentially so valuable for Texas' agencies.

I also pointed out that in 2002 there was a lawsuit settlement against Advance PCS, now CVS/Caremark, for fraudulent business practices in the FEHBP program and the Letter Carriers program. The money settlement was approximately $179 million plus a five-year transparency requirement much like the requirements of HR 4489. That settlement is now expired so this legislation is very timely indeed.

Richard's signature
Richard E. Beck, RPh
Executive Director, Texas Pharmacy Business Council

More patient confusion about mandatory  CVS patronage
One of our members sent this e-mail a few weeks ago:

"I just had a former customer stop in for a visit. He said he sure wished he could do business here, but the state's Caremark CVS plan makes him use CVS. He said 'they make it where you have to pay more if you trade anywhere but CVS. Sure sorry I can't trade here. I rejected their mail order plan, but shop at CVS.'

"Any suggestions to help win back this customer?"

This is an ongoing concern we have about how Caremark communicates with ERS beneficiaries, so we forwarded it to ERS. We got a quick response from Robert Kukla, ERS benefits contracts director, confirming the ERS prescription drug program  does not favor CVS over any pharmacy. Members are able to utilize any licensed pharmacy in the state.

He asked for the patient's name so he could clear up misconceptions.

TPBC continues to hear from our members that patients in the ERS plan believe they must use CVS pharmacies to get the best price on non-mail order drugs. In view of past communication errors by CVS/Caremark to ERS beneficiaries, I have asked ERS to determine why some ERS beneficiaries have this misperception.

I also asked ERS to do a mailing to plan members that makes it crystal clear that no retail provider in the network holds any special advantage to the plan or member over any other retail provider. It has been a while since the new materials of the Health Select plan were mailed, so perhaps a reminder might be in order.

My biggest concern continues to be; how many ERS plan members are out there have this mistaken perception and have been silent and are utilizing CVS pharmacies due to that mistaken perception.

I reminded ERS that these conflict-of-interest issues have culminated in a full investigation by the Federal Trade Commission of the merger between CVS and Caremark and the company's business practices.

I haven't heard back from ERS on this request. We are following up on it and will let you know the results. Please let me know whether you have patients with the same misperception. If you provide the patient's name, ERS has volunteered to contact the individual and make certain he knows he as the right to purchase from any network pharmacy.
Texas Pharmacy Business Council
Ensuring patient access to quality pharmacy care services,
the viability of community pharmacy and the pharmacy profession.

1001 Congress Ave., Suite 250, Austin, TX 78701 512.992.1219
Richard E. Beck, RPh, Executive Director
www.TxRxCouncil.org