|
|
Texas
Pharmacy Business Council is an organization of
American Pharmacies and the Academy of Independent
Pharmacists-Texas.
|
|
TDI pharmacy help
|
The Texas Department of
Insurance has a Pharmacist Resource Page that
includes links to complaint forms and advises when
the next Pharmacy Outreach Conference Call will be
held.
Add this link to your online
"favorites" list.
|
|
Texas legislation
success
list |
Regulation
of Rx discount
cards
PBM
transparency in state
contracts
|
| |
 |
Happy Independence
Day! TPBC draws line in the
dirt in PBM battle |
Last week was noteworthy in our ongoing
fight to teach government and industry how to
really save money on prescription drug prices
without skinning independent community
pharmacy.
I was part of a panel testifying
during the U.S. House Subcommittee examining
federal employee health benefits. Specifically, I
spoke in favor of HR
4489, the Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program (FEHBP) Prescription Drug Integrity,
Transparency, and Cost Savings Act by U.S. Rep.
Stephen Lynch (D-Mass).
The bill is intended to lower costs
of prescription drugs in the FEHBP and provide the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with more
oversight authority over the prescription drug
benefit. Specifically, the act
would:
- prohibit
certain ownership relationships (such as
CVS/Caremark;
- require
Pharmacy Benefit Mangers (PBMs) to return 99
percent of all monies received from
manufacturers for FEHBP business;
- require total
transparency and disclosure of all contract
terms and related information to
OPM.
In
my testimony, I shared
with the committee how transparency in state PBM
contracts is projected by the Texas Employees
Retirement System to save $260 million during the
next four years. This is the result of requiring
100 percent pass through of savings from
pharmaceutical manufacturers to the insurer, and
hence to the approximately 500,000 current and
retired state employees and their
families.
Subcommittee Chairman Lynch was naturally impressed with this savings!
FEHBP has 270 different health plans, so the
savings could be astronomical.
I explained that Texas conducted two
studies examining the value of transparency in PBM
contracts, leading to the legislation that is
potentially so valuable for Texas'
agencies.
I
also pointed out that in 2002 there was a lawsuit
settlement against Advance PCS, now CVS/Caremark,
for fraudulent business practices in the FEHBP
program and the Letter Carriers program. The money
settlement was approximately $179 million plus a
five-year transparency requirement much like the
requirements of HR 4489. That settlement is now
expired so this legislation is very timely indeed.
 Richard E. Beck,
RPh Executive Director, Texas Pharmacy Business
Council
|
 |
More patient confusion
about mandatory CVS
patronage
|
|
One of our members
sent this e-mail a few weeks ago:
"I just
had a former customer stop in for a visit. He said
he sure wished he could do business here, but the
state's Caremark CVS plan makes him use CVS. He
said 'they make it where you have to pay more if
you trade anywhere but CVS. Sure sorry I can't
trade here. I rejected their mail order plan, but
shop at CVS.'
"Any suggestions to help win
back this customer?"
This is an ongoing
concern we have about how Caremark communicates
with ERS beneficiaries, so we forwarded it to ERS.
We got a quick response from Robert Kukla, ERS
benefits contracts director, confirming the ERS prescription drug
program does not favor CVS over any
pharmacy. Members are able to utilize any licensed
pharmacy in the state.
He asked for the
patient's name so he could clear up
misconceptions.
TPBC continues to hear
from our members that patients in the ERS plan
believe they must use CVS pharmacies to get the
best price on non-mail order drugs. In view of
past communication errors by CVS/Caremark to ERS
beneficiaries, I have asked ERS to determine why
some ERS beneficiaries have this misperception.
I also asked ERS to do a mailing to plan
members that makes it crystal clear that no retail
provider in the network holds any special
advantage to the plan or member over any other
retail provider. It has been a while since the new
materials of the Health Select plan were mailed,
so perhaps a reminder might be in order.
My biggest concern continues to be; how
many ERS plan members are out there have this
mistaken perception and have been silent and are
utilizing CVS pharmacies due to that mistaken
perception.
I reminded ERS
that these conflict-of-interest issues have
culminated in a full investigation by the Federal
Trade Commission of the merger between CVS and
Caremark and the company's business
practices.
I haven't heard back from ERS on
this request. We are following up on it and will
let you know the results. Please let me know
whether you have patients with the same
misperception. If you provide the patient's name,
ERS has volunteered to contact the individual and
make certain he knows he as the right to purchase
from any network
pharmacy.
| |
| |
Texas
Pharmacy Business Council Ensuring patient access to
quality pharmacy care services, the viability of
community pharmacy and the pharmacy
profession. 1001
Congress Ave., Suite 250, Austin, TX 78701
512.992.1219 Richard
E. Beck,
RPh, Executive Director www.TxRxCouncil.org | | |